Wiseacre Blawg

Legal and law articles. Law News. Blawg Links.

Is an Oral Contract as Good as a Written Contract?

An Oral Contract is as legally binding as a Written Contract, the issue with an Oral Contract is in proving its existence. To begin, the existence of a Written Contract is fairly obvious, either there is a writing or there isn’t. An oral contract, by definition, does not have a writing to support its terms, conditions or even existence. So how can we prove that it exists? One way is to use witness testimony. If A and B enter into an oral agreement, and C and D are present at the time the oral contract is made, C and D can be used to prove the existence of the oral contract. Their testimony that they heard the terms of the agreement will be sufficient to prove the existence of an Oral Contract.

Course of Conduct is another way to prove the existence of an oral contract. Let’s assume that X offers to buy a radio from Y for $50. Y accepts and hands the radio to X, who then gives Y $50. The parties’ course of conduct indicates that an oral contract existed. If the radio were defective, or if Y changed his mind, he could not say that a contract did not exist. Another example of Course of Conduct would be your typical neighborhood newspaper delivery. For the most part, the newspaper boy delivers a newspaper to you and you pay him on a weekly basis. There is rarely a written agreement with the newspaper boy to deliver newspapers. You simply tell him, “please deliver a paper to me, and I will pay you”. If the newspaper boy delivers newspapers to you for a few week, and you pay him, an oral contract exists based upon the parties course of conduct. After this time, if the papers are delivered and then you refuse to pay, you cannot allege that there is no contract. The Course of Conduct indicates that an Oral Contract exists.

Credibility of the parties is another factor in proving the existence of an Oral Contract. Suppose that Patron walks into a local restaurant and orders a plate of spaghetti. When Patron orders the spaghetti, an offer is made by Patron to pay for a plate of spaghetti. When the server brings the spaghetti to Patron, an Acceptance occurs and a binding oral contract is made. Credibility comes into play where the Patron then refuses to pay for spaghetti, saying “I never agreed to pay for this, I thought it was free”. All of you can see that is an incredible statement. Should that type of matter go to court, a judge would look at the credibility of the parties in regard to the situation and likely find that an oral contract was formed. If you reconsider the spaghetti scenario, though, you can see where an oral contract would be just as legally binding as a written contract. If a lawsuit were to arise out of the patron’s failure to pay, any court in the land would find the existence of the oral contract based upon credibility.

The existence of an oral contract can be more difficult to prove in a different type of scenario. Imagine a scenario with P and Q. P and Q are complete strangers. P approached Q and offers to buy a Corvette from Q for $1,000. Q laughs, and says “sure”, then drives away in the Corvette. If P attempts to enforce what he feels is a binding oral agreement, will he succeed? He will have a very difficult time proving that a contract exists. There is no writing to show the agreement. There is no prior course of dealing between the parties. There were no other witnesses to this alleged conversation. Credibility becomes an issue here, along with believe-ability.
As you can see, the difficulty in enforcement of an oral contract lies in the parties' ability to prove what the terms of the contract were. Absent proof of the terms of the contract, a party may be unable to enforce what it believes to be a firm contract. Evidence, such as witness testimony, prior dealing of the parties, course of conduct and credibility of the parties are some factors that may play into the enforcement of an oral contract. If sufficient evidence can be established that the parties orally entered into a contract, the terms of that contract will be enforced. If the proof is strong, then an oral contract is just as binding as a written one. The question at hand lies with the sufficiency of that oral evidence.

About the author: Greg Artim is an Attorney with offices located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. For more answers to your Contracts or other legal questions, please visit his website at www.gregartim.com

Labels: , , ,


Blogger Sam Hasler said...

You got a pretty good description of the problems with an oral contract here. And I do like the name of the blog.

11/29/08, 12:29 PM  
Blogger Armani said...

The incidence and prognosis of whiplash injury from motor vehicle
collisions may be related to eligibility for compensation for pain
and suffering.
Houston Whiplash Attorney

10/11/11, 5:49 PM  
Blogger Mike said...

I am looking into filing a suit against a company regarding statements their representatives told me but I wanted to get a legal opinion on the enforceability of this oral contract. Keep in mind that I am a Marine Corps veteran and work in clinical research if that helps with my credibility. The following is how things happened:
In preparation for medical school I paid for a Kaplan course in order to get help approaching and taking the MCAT with the understanding that if I did not do well and was unsatisfied with my scores I could receive a full refund per the money back guarantee. Although, upon my the receipt of my dissatisfied scores I opted for a refund in order to find alternate help. When I initially called to get a refund, the Kaplan representative told me that in order to qualify for a refund I must take the course and MCAT a second time before I was eligible for the refund. The representative then asked when I wanted to sign up for the next course but since I was preparing for exams, I told the representative that I would need to call back after I figured out my schedule. Some time pasted, several months I believe, then I called back Kaplan to reschedule my course so I may qualify for a refund if my scores were unsatisfactory for the second time. Shortly after signing up for the course, maybe two classes in, I discovered that because of the difficult classes I was taking I would need to take the Kapaln course at a different time, so I called Kaplan in order to see what my options were so I could still qualify for the money back guarantee since all of the work needed to be completed. I was told that I could freeze my course on a one time basis with no problem and I would still qualify for my money back guarantee as long as I still completed all of my work once I took the full course the next time I scheduled it. Ultimately I decided to freeze the course until I was able to reschedule and retake the course since, per the representative, freezing the course would not affect my ability to qualify for the money back guarantee. The real problem arose recently, after retaking the Kaplan course, completing all of the course work (even with all of the computer program issues) and MCAT exam and receiving unsatisfactory scores, I discovered that the Kaplan representatives I had been speaking with were telling me incorrect statements that did not follow their policy even though I had asked them about it in earlier conversations. I was also recently told that because I froze the course, that alone made me ineligible for the money back guarantee even though specifically asked and was told all along that it would not affect my eligibility in that respect. I am still attempting to get a refund and plan on taking legal action if nothing is done to settle this dishonesty and deceit by a multinational, multimillion dollar company to a Marine corps veteran who wants to attend medical school and help others.


12/20/12, 10:54 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home